登陆注册
34564700000024

第24章

Soc. Then now we have discovered a sort of rhetoric which is addressed to a crowd of men, women, and children, freemen and slaves. And this is not much to our taste, for we have described it as having the nature of flattery.

Cal. Quite true.

Soc. Very good. And what do you say of that other rhetoric which addresses the Athenian assembly and the assemblies of freemen in other states? Do the rhetoricians appear to you always to aim at what is best, and do they seek to improve the citizens by their speeches, or are they too, like the rest of mankind, bent upon giving them pleasure, forgetting the public good in the thought of their own interest, playing with the people as with children, and trying to amuse them, but never considering whether they are better or worse for this?

Cal. I must distinguish. There are some who have a real care of the public in what they say, while others are such as you describe.

Soc. I am contented with the admission that rhetoric is of two sorts; one, which is mere flattery and disgraceful declamation; the other, which is noble and aims at the training and improvement of the souls of the citizens, and strives to say what is best, whether welcome or unwelcome, to the audience; but have you ever known such a rhetoric; or if you have, and can point out any rhetorician who is of this stamp, who is he?

Cal. But, indeed, I am afraid that I cannot tell you of any such among the orators who are at present living.

Soc. Well, then, can you mention any one of a former generation, who may be said to have improved the Athenians, who found them worse and made them better, from the day that he began to make speeches? for, indeed, I do not know of such a man.

Cal. What! did you never hear that Themistocles was a good man, and Cimon and Miltiades and Pericles, who is just lately dead, and whom you heard yourself?

Soc. Yes, Callicles, they were good men, if, as you said at first, true virtue consists only in the satisfaction of our own desires and those of others; but if not, and if, as we were afterwards compelled to acknowledge, the satisfaction of some desires makes us better, and of others, worse, and we ought to gratify the one and not the other, and there is an art in distinguishing them-can you tell me of any of these statesmen who did distinguish them?

Cal. No, indeed, I cannot.

Soc. Yet, surely, Callicles, if you look you will find such a one.

Suppose that we just calmly consider whether any of these was such as I have described. Will not the good man, who says whatever he says with a view to the best, speak with a reference to some standard and not at random; just as all other artists, whether the painter, the builder, the shipwright, or any other look all of them to their own work, and do not select and apply at random what they apply, but strive to give a definite form to it? The artist disposes all things in order, and compels the one part to harmonize and accord with the other part, until he has constructed a regular and systematic whole; and this is true of all artists, and in the same way the trainers and physicians, of whom we spoke before, give order and regularity to the body: do you deny this?

Cal. No; I am ready to admit it.

Soc. Then the house in which order and regularity prevail is good, that in which there is disorder, evil?

Cal. Yes.

Soc. And the same is true of a ship?

Cal. Yes.

Soc. And the same may be said of the human body?

Cal. Yes.

Soc. And what would you say of the soul? Will the good soul be that in which disorder is prevalent, or that in which there is harmony and order?

Cal. The latter follows from our previous admissions.

Soc. What is the name which is given to the effect of harmony and order in the body?

Cal. I suppose that you mean health and strength?

Soc. Yes, I do; and what is the name which you would give to the effect of harmony and order in the soul? Try and discover a name for this as well as for the other.

Cal. Why not give the name yourself, Socrates?

Soc. Well, if you had rather that I should, I will; and you shall say whether you agree with me, and if not, you shall refute and answer me. "Healthy," as I conceive, is the name which is given to the regular order of the body, whence comes health and every other bodily excellence: is that true or not?

Cal. True.

Soc. And "lawful" and "law" are the names which are given to the regular order and action of the soul, and these make men lawful and orderly:-and so we have temperance and justice: have we not?

Cal. Granted.

Soc. And will not the true rhetorician who is honest and understands his art have his eye fixed upon these, in all the words which he addresses to the souls of men, and in all his actions, both in what he gives and in what he takes away? Will not his aim be to implant justice in the souls of his citizens mind take away injustice, to implant temperance and take away intemperance, to implant every virtue and take away every vice? Do you not agree?

Cal. I agree.

Soc. For what use is there, Callicles, in giving to the body of a sick man who is in a bad state of health a quantity of the most delightful food or drink or any other pleasant thing, which may be really as bad for him as if you gave him nothing, or even worse if rightly estimated. Is not that true?

Cal. I will not say No to it.

Soc. For in my opinion there is no profit in a man's life if his body is in an evil plight-in that case his life also is evil: am I not right?

Cal. Yes.

Soc. When a man is in health the physicians will generally allow him to eat when he is hungry and drink when he is thirsty, and to satisfy his desires as he likes, but when he is sick they hardly suffer him to satisfy his desires at all: even you will admit that?

Cal. Yes.

Soc. And does not the same argument hold of the soul, my good sir?

While she is in a bad state and is senseless and intemperate and unjust and unholy, her desires ought to be controlled, and she ought to be prevented from doing anything which does not tend to her own improvement.

Cal. Yes.

Soc. Such treatment will be better for the soul herself?

Cal. To be sure.

Soc. And to restrain her from her appetites is to chastise her?

Cal. Yes.

同类推荐
热门推荐
  • 绝世道宗

    绝世道宗

    古老的中国道术,在这个魔法和斗气横行的世界里将如何发扬光大?来自地球的年轻人,在这个种族林立的大陆里又该何去何从?本书为你讲述一代道宗的传奇人生……
  • 我与你的星辰世纪

    我与你的星辰世纪

    夏至星作为一个心理医生,秉持一条铁律:不和有病的人恋爱。莫辰一向清冷的声音道:“夏至星,你是我唯一的良药!”……初见,夏至星看着秋千上的白衣少年,忽然想起那句:陌生人如玉,公子世无双。一时的恶意,夏之星推动了原本沉静的秋千,仿若命运的齿轮开启,从此那个少年霸道的介入她生活,让她生活他支离破碎。后来,夏至星跑到异国他乡,用五年的时间将他们的世界恢复平行。归来,命运的牵扯让原本走在两条平行线上的他们再次纠缠。莫辰:“夏之星,多年不见,你胆子到是越来越大了?”夏至星:“因为你在!”曾经,这个少年护她青春肆意张扬!现在,这个男子伴她命运波涛汹涌!……莫辰:“星星,我的黑白世界因你而精彩。”
  • 信我这次

    信我这次

    “我金榜题名之时,即你我成婚之日”但终究是错付了,小妖因为执念未散,重生于此。接受着不属于自己的好意。“我并不是您的夫人,国师大人。”小妖一脸诚恳地道出实情。“你不是谁是?”国师一脸戏谑。“您的夫人她已经……”话还未说完,就已经被眼前的这位男人封住了口,后来妖不止一次和他说明,但无一不是被打断。小妖不敢接受男人的好,正在犹豫要不要离开,男人喝醉了……抱着她不撒手,口中喃喃道“别离开,别走,我会做的更好的,我爱的自始至终都是你,不是别人真的,真的……什么都比不得你,真的,真的,信我,信我,别走……”
  • 牛肉加点糖

    牛肉加点糖

    仰望星空,不知何处何从,手中战刀,不知挥向何方,爱,早已远去,血,却还未冷。哦,原来,我们还在战场,所以要敢战,所以,要好战。
  • tfboys之我是鹿晗的妹妹

    tfboys之我是鹿晗的妹妹

    这主要讲了鹿晗的妹妹凌紫梦姐妹和三只发生了一些关系,第一次写希望大家可以支持我写的小说。
  • 史上最强狂婿

    史上最强狂婿

    被喊了三年瞎子,入赘苏家后,叶子风就不知道自己的老婆长啥样。如今功法大成睁开双眼,入赘的那些苦真没白挨,尤其是知道自己妻子美若天仙后……
  • 雪影大陆

    雪影大陆

    本来只愿平凡一生,却因为一次意外来到了陌生的世界;本来懵懂不知所求,却因世人所逼走上了从未想过的道路。一次次的被逼得与自己的初衷背道而驰。陌生?孤独?落寞?又有谁能读懂主角的内心世界?谁又能真正的闯入他的内心?
  • 抗战之烽火军医

    抗战之烽火军医

    【热血新书】现代军医付辰意外中穿越1931年,看军事世家出身的他考黄埔,打鬼子!
  • 灯火阑珊,一曲高歌

    灯火阑珊,一曲高歌

    我觉得,它会陪伴我走过很多路,横跨过去和未来。
  • 迟到的情之所钟

    迟到的情之所钟

    “你相信命吗?”许君羡问道。“我信你命里带煞。”岑乔不假思索地说。不然为什么每次遇见许君羡她就倒霉?先是当着他的面出丑,去找他的时候被车撞,然后还追尾了他的车,自己的新车也撞烂了,最后还把自己的人和心赔进去了……