登陆注册
34881200000052

第52章 IMPEACHMENT REPORTED TO THE SENATE.(11)

And in answer to the eleventh article, this respondent denies that on the 18th day of August, in the year 1866, at the City of Washington, in the District of Columbia, he did, by public speech or otherwise, declare or affirm, in substance or at all, that the thirty-ninth Congress of the United States was not a Congress of the United States authorized by the constitution to exercise legislative power under the same, or that he did then and there declare or affirm that the said thirty-ninth Congress was a Congress of only part of the States in any sense or meaning other than that ten States of the Union were denied representation therein; or that he made any or either of the declarations or affrmations in this behalf, in the said article alleged, as denying or intending to deny that the legislation of said thirty-ninth Congress was valid or obligatory upon this respondent, except so far as this respondent saw fit to approve the same; and as to the allegation in said article, that be did thereby intend or mean to be understood that the said Congress had not power to propose amendments to the Constitution, this respondent says that in said address he said nothing in reference to the subject of amendments of the Constitution. nor was the question of the competency of the said Congress to propose such amendments, without the participation of said excluded States. at the time of said address in any way mentioned or considered or referred to by this respondent. nor in what he did say had he any intent regarding the same, and he denies the allegation so made to the contrary thereof. But this respondent, in further answer to, and in respect of, the said allegations of the said eleventh article hereinbefore traversed and denied, claims and insists upon his personal and official right of ******* of opinion and ******* of speech, and his duty in his political relations as President of the United States to the people of the United States in the exercise of such ******* of opinion and ******* of speech, in the same manner, form and effect as he has in this behalf stated the same in his answer to the said tenth article, and with the same effect as if he here repeated the same; and he further claims and insists, as in said answer to said tenth article he has claimed and insisted, that he is not subject to question, inquisition, impeachment, or inculpation, in any form or manner, of or concerning such rights of ******* of opinion or ******* of speech or his alleged exercise thereof.

And this respondent further denies that on the 21st day of February, in the year 1868, or at any other time, at the City of Washington, in the District of Columbia, in pursuance of any such declaration as is in that behalf in said eleventh article alleged, or otherwise, he did unlawfully, and in disregard of the requirement of the Constitution that he should take care that the laws should be faithfully executed, attempt to prevent the execution of an act entitled "An act regulating the tenure of certain civil offices," passed March 2, 1867, by unlawfully devising or contriving, or attempting to devise or contrive, means by which he should prevent Edwin M. Stanton from forthwith resuming the functions of Secretary for the Department of War, or by lawfully devising or contriving, or attempting to devise or contrive, means to prevent the execution of an act entitled "An act ****** appropriations for the support of the army for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1868, and for other purposes,"approved March 2, 1867, or to prevent the execution of an act entitled "An act to provide for the more efficient government of the rebel States," passed March 2, 1867.

And this respondent, further answering the said eleventh article, says that he has, in his answer to the first article, set forth in detail the acts, steps, and proccedings done and taken by this respondent to and toward or in the matter of the suspension or removal of the said Edwin M. Stanton in or from the office of Secretary for the Department of War, with the times, modes, circumstances, intents, views, purposes, and opinions of official obligation and duty under and with which such acts, steps, and proceedings were done and taken; and he makes answer to this eleventh article of the matters in his answer to the first article, pertaining to the suspension or removal of said Edwin M.

Stanton, to the same intent and effect as if they were here repeated and set forth.

And this deponent, further answering the said eleventh article, denies that by means or reason of anything in said article alleged, this respondent, as President of the United States, did, on the 21st day of February, 1868, or at any other day or time.

commit, or that he was guilty of, a high misdemeanor in office.

And this respondent, further answering the said eleventh article, says that the same and the matters therein contained do not charge or allege the commission of any act whatever by this respondent, in his office of President of the United States, nor the omission by this respondent of any act of official obligation or duty in his office of President of the United States; nor does the said article nor the matters therein contained name designate, describe, or define any act or mode or form of attempt, device, contrivance, or means, or of attempt at device, contrivance or means, whereby this respondent can know or understand what act or mode or form of attempt, device, contrivance or means, or of attempt at device, contrivance, or means are imputed to or charged against this respondent, in his office of President of the United States, or intended so to be, or whereby this respondent can more fully or definitely make answer unto the said article than he hereby does.

And this respondent, in submitting to this honorable court this his answer to the articles of impeachment exhibited against him, respectfully reserves leave to amend and add to the same from time to time, as may become necessary or proper, and when and as such necessity and propriety shall appear.

Andrew Johnson Henry Stanbery, B. R. Curtis, Thomas A. R. Nelson, William M.

Evarts. W. S. Groesbeck. Of Counsel.

同类推荐
热门推荐
  • 专家诊治心律失常(谷臻小简·AI导读版)

    专家诊治心律失常(谷臻小简·AI导读版)

    一本全面并且系统的介绍心律失常问题的书;本书尽选常见病、多发病,聘请相关专家编写该病的来龙去脉、诊断、治疗、护理、预防……凡病人或家属可能之疑问,悉数详尽解述。此书10余万字,包括数百条目,或以问诊方式,一问一答,十分明确;或分章节段落,一事一叙一目了然。
  • 贞观逍遥茶楼

    贞观逍遥茶楼

    大唐贞观,当玄武门的血腥味渐渐的淡去,长安城内,却有一桩桩诡异的谋杀上演。死者均是心口一刀毙命。通判、少尹、京兆尹、雍州牧皆是束手无策。此事到达天听之时,圣上大惊,朝会议事。群臣无策,此时药师推荐一人,李世民急问何人。李药师说道:“身在红尘逍遥客,纸扇轻摇说书人。一盏闲茶鬼神欲,一壶浊酒日月长。”
  • 无戏言:写给中国玩家的人生逆袭指南

    无戏言:写给中国玩家的人生逆袭指南

    本书通过讲述11位中国游戏界大佬的人生逆袭故事,向正以各种状态生存着的中国玩家们展示出另一片天地——如果你想,玩转人生并非只能online。在许多人看来,本书中的11位主人公有着一个共同的头衔——行业领军人物。但《游戏人生》的专访会让你看到,“成功者”头衔的背后其实是11张不同的面孔:他们中间有曾经的中专物理教师、战斗机设计师、梦想成为航海家的人,甚至有因为创业的艰难曾经抑郁的人。但是,他们在悲观失望的时候选择了面对现实、坚持努力,继而华丽转身、“逆袭”成功。今天,这11位看似普通的人,站在了游戏行业的前沿!
  • 阴阳妁散

    阴阳妁散

    少年在宣纸上画下了一个圈,于是无止境的轮回便开始了。人生在世,又如何不会有牵挂。佛说:执于一念,将受困于一念;一念放下,会自在于心间。但执念,又怎会轻易放下……这里的一切,究竟是结束……还是开始……少年皱了皱眉头:怎么,又是个圈?
  • 天行

    天行

    号称“北辰骑神”的天才玩家以自创的“牧马冲锋流”战术击败了国服第一弓手北冥雪,被誉为天纵战榜第一骑士的他,却受到小人排挤,最终离开了效力已久的银狐俱乐部。是沉沦,还是再次崛起?恰逢其时,月恒集团第四款游戏“天行”正式上线,虚拟世界再起风云!
  • 天行

    天行

    号称“北辰骑神”的天才玩家以自创的“牧马冲锋流”战术击败了国服第一弓手北冥雪,被誉为天纵战榜第一骑士的他,却受到小人排挤,最终离开了效力已久的银狐俱乐部。是沉沦,还是再次崛起?恰逢其时,月恒集团第四款游戏“天行”正式上线,虚拟世界再起风云!
  • 时光安好

    时光安好

    苏瑶是围绕着行星的一颗行星,邢星是她的中心,即使这样,但是苏瑶却不能靠近只能沿着固定的轨道,不能靠近,不能远离,只能这样,遥遥相望,无法改变。
  • 萌剑大纯男

    萌剑大纯男

    此书不再本站更新!着实不好意思!请大家多担待!
  • 家的关系

    家的关系

    随着年龄的增长,心智不断的成熟,与父母的交流越来越少,对父母的关心也藏在心底,希望你看了我的文章,可以更好地和家人一起。
  • 天行

    天行

    号称“北辰骑神”的天才玩家以自创的“牧马冲锋流”战术击败了国服第一弓手北冥雪,被誉为天纵战榜第一骑士的他,却受到小人排挤,最终离开了效力已久的银狐俱乐部。是沉沦,还是再次崛起?恰逢其时,月恒集团第四款游戏“天行”正式上线,虚拟世界再起风云!