That education should be regulated by law and should be an affair of state is not to be denied, but what should be the character of this public education, and how young persons should be educated, are questions which remain to be considered. As things are, there is disagreement about the subjects. For mankind are by no means agreed about the things to be taught, whether we look to virtue or the best life. Neither is it clear whether education is more concerned with intellectual or with moral virtue. The existing practice is perplexing; no one knows on what principle we should proceed- should the useful in life, or should virtue, or should the higher knowledge, be the aim of our training; all three opinions have been entertained. Again, about the means there is no agreement; for different persons, starting with different ideas about the nature of virtue, naturally disagree about the practice of it. There can be no doubt that children should be taught those useful things which are really necessary, but not all useful things; for occupations are divided into liberal and illiberal; and to young children should be imparted only such kinds of knowledge as will be useful to them without vulgarizing them. And any occupation, art, or science, which makes the body or soul or mind of the freeman less fit for the practice or exercise of virtue, is vulgar; wherefore we call those arts vulgar which tend to deform the body, and likewise all paid employments, for they absorb and degrade the mind. There are also some liberal arts quite proper for a freeman to acquire, but only in a certain degree, and if he attend to them too closely, in order to attain perfection in them, the same evil effects will follow. The object also which a man sets before him makes a great difference; if he does or learns anything for his own sake or for the sake of his friends, or with a view to excellence the action will not appear illiberal; but if done for the sake of others, the very same action will be thought menial and servile. The received subjects of instruction, as I have already remarked, are partly of a liberal and party of an illiberal character.
同类推荐
热门推荐
婚后相爱：易烊千玺可不可喜欢我
唐韵雪“千玺当初的事情真的不是我做的肯定是有人诬陷我”易烊千玺“谁会那么无聊诬陷你而且那时候你和她还都被绑架了你思平安回来了她却没有！”说完这句话摔了门走了出去，唐韵雪追出去喊到“真的不是我我也不知道是怎么回事你怎么可以不相信我我让你相信就那么难吗！”说完泪眼朦胧的看着千玺开着车子走了只就给她一个背景。
中山丰
“喂~你们听说了吗?”“听说什么呀？”“玄机神教被灭了!”“据说，是被八大门派联合朝廷围攻三天三夜，玄机神教教主奋力激战，最终尸骨无存，惨死在围攻之中。”“另外，各大门派，朝廷一直在搜寻皇极经书，可就是没找到……”京城，晓云客栈。外面黑云密布，雷雨交加，有侠客正交头接耳，议论这几天江湖发生的大事件。“跟我们走一趟吧！”一名女子伤痛欲绝的一杯又一杯的喝着酒，对一切都漠不关心，突然一柄飞镖从女子脸颊飞过，将她的酒杯打碎，酒水洒落在桌子上。而这时，酒楼进来了三名男子，均带着斗笠蓑衣。看着这沉默不语的女子。“没兴趣!”这女子依旧重新拿起一个酒杯闭眼喝着酒。“皇极经书，你也没兴趣吗？”这时端着酒杯的女子眼睛睁开，转身看向这三人。“玄机神教教主席慕蓉到底是生是死?”
陈布雷与陈伯达：历史转折点上的两个“秀才”
他和他在一起，就是一本文人从政与从政文人的必读书！国共两文胆，浮尘一悲歌。他们，一个以死来为旧王朝殉葬，一个在新时代把自己送入牢笼。他们，虽有纵横文字之才，却身不由己。他们，是政治与人性冲突中历史的人质。以陈布雷、陈伯达两人一生的轨迹为主线，以国共两党的“四次历史转折点”为基本环节，叙述了国共两党相关人员的群体活动，勾勒了国共两党政治思想文化宣传建设的基本风貌与当年思想文化斗争的宏大场景。对陈布雷与陈伯达个人的人格人品、学养学风、情感与家庭生活、行为的是与非、优点缺点与错误、世界观人生观的转变与演变轨迹，及与各自政党领导人的交往、恩恩怨怨等，都有较为细致的叙述。