登陆注册
37828000000096

第96章 XII(2)

In the Republic of Plato, Socrates treats of revolutions, but not well, for he mentions no cause of change which peculiarly affects the first, or perfect state. He only says that the cause is that nothing is abiding, but all things change in a certain cycle; and that the origin of the change consists in those numbers 'of which 4 and 3, married with 5, furnish two harmonies' (he means when the number of this figure becomes solid); he conceives that nature at certain times produces bad men who will not submit to education; in which latter particular he may very likely be not far wrong, for there may well be some men who cannot be educated and made virtuous. But why is such a cause of change peculiar to his ideal state, and not rather common to all states, nay, to everything which comes into being at all? And is it by the agency of time, which, as he declares, makes all things change, that things which did not begin together, change together? For example, if something has come into being the day before the completion of the cycle, will it change with things that came into being before? Further, why should the perfect state change into the Spartan? For governments more often take an opposite form than one akin to them. The same remark is applicable to the other changes; he says that the Spartan constitution changes into an oligarchy, and this into a democracy, and this again into a tyranny.

And yet the contrary happens quite as often; for a democracy is even more likely to change into an oligarchy than into a monarchy. Further, he never says whether tyranny is, or is not, liable to revolutions, and if it is, what is the cause of them, or into what form it changes.

And the reason is, that he could not very well have told: for there is no rule; according to him it should revert to the first and best, and then there would be a complete cycle. But in point of fact a tyranny often changes into a tyranny, as that at Sicyon changed from the tyranny of Myron into that of Cleisthenes; into oligarchy, as the tyranny of Antileon did at Chalcis; into democracy, as that of Gelo's family did at Syracuse; into aristocracy, as at Carthage, and the tyranny of Charilaus at Lacedaemon. Often an oligarchy changes into a tyranny, like most of the ancient oligarchies in Sicily; for example, the oligarchy at Leontini changed into the tyranny of Panaetius; that at Gela into the tyranny of Cleander; that at Rhegium into the tyranny of Anaxilaus; the same thing has happened in many other states. And it is absurd to suppose that the state changes into oligarchy merely because the ruling class are lovers and makers of money, and not because the very rich think it unfair that the very poor should have an equal share in the government with themselves. Moreover, in many oligarchies there are laws against ****** money in trade. But at Carthage, which is a democracy. there is no such prohibition; and yet to this day the Carthaginians have never had a revolution. It is absurd too for him to say that an oligarchy is two cities, one of the rich, and the other of the poor.

Is not this just as much the case in the Spartan constitution, or in any other in which either all do not possess equal property, or all are not equally good men? Nobody need be any poorer than he was before, and yet the oligarchy may change an the same into a democracy, if the poor form the majority; and a democracy may change into an oligarchy, if the wealthy class are stronger than the people, and the one are energetic, the other indifferent. Once more, although the causes of the change are very numerous, he mentions only one, which is, that the citizens become poor through dissipation and debt, as though he thought that all, or the majority of them, were originally rich. This is not true: though it is true that when any of the leaders lose their property they are ripe for revolution; but, when anybody else, it is no great matter, and an oligarchy does not even then more often pass into a democracy than into any other form of government. Again, if men are deprived of the honors of state, and are wronged, and insulted, they make revolutions, and change forms of government, even although they have not wasted their substance because they might do what they liked- of which extravagance he declares excessive ******* to be the cause.

Finally, although there are many forms of oligarchies and democracies, Socrates speaks of their revolutions as though there were only one form of either of them.

同类推荐
热门推荐
  • 我怎么就成大佬了呢

    我怎么就成大佬了呢

    大荒世界,修仙问道。白墨带着农家乐穿越后,只想安稳地度过这一生。直到某一天,他突然发现。家里的大黄一口吞掉了月亮。打鸣的公鸡啄死了万丈邪魔蜈蚣。水池里的鲤鱼化身五爪金龙,统御四海。瘸腿的鹦鹉佛光残绕,大威天龙。……院里的花花草草是至尊仙药。厨房内的锅碗瓢盆是逆天神器。桌脚垫着的是造化仙法,墙上挂着的是九天仙界。……白墨:“信我!我真不是大佬!”
  • 爱情的旅途

    爱情的旅途

    一个人的旅途中,她偶遇不惑之年、自称为“狼”的男人。
  • 良心启示录

    良心启示录

    《良心启示录》主要内容简介:若要多威好,良心是首要。用户如父母,工友如家宝。
  • 异界修神之死神诅咒

    异界修神之死神诅咒

    中了死神诅咒照样纵横异界。强横法诀使他不惧任何神魔,绝世神器使他收服万千强大魔兽。神族之王向他妥协,魔族之王被他收入11。。。。死神只有被他追着打的份。。。翔飞————一个神魔畏惧的名子。。。。。(感谢中国作者素材免费封面支持ZZSCK.COM)
  • 翊山白狐传

    翊山白狐传

    我是这天上地下仅有一人的狐帝的女儿氿妍,从前我过得很幸福,父亲母亲很疼爱我。我的母亲不在以后给我留下了一个名唤离瑜的手链,我自母亲去世后便戴着,听父亲说,它能控制我体内的力量。后来我遇到了他……“一辈子真的很长,但是我能陪你好久好久……”
  • 无上神君

    无上神君

    浩瀚世界,光怪陆离,精彩纷呈。梁旭在神秘珠子的护佑下穿越到一个玄奇瑰丽的世界,意外获得了对空间无与伦比的掌控力。念动,身行,瞬移十万里,真正的是“身随意动!”。十步杀一人,千里不留行,而梁旭是瞬杀,这是传奇的开始。
  • 天行

    天行

    号称“北辰骑神”的天才玩家以自创的“牧马冲锋流”战术击败了国服第一弓手北冥雪,被誉为天纵战榜第一骑士的他,却受到小人排挤,最终离开了效力已久的银狐俱乐部。是沉沦,还是再次崛起?恰逢其时,月恒集团第四款游戏“天行”正式上线,虚拟世界再起风云!
  • 异能重生:宅女变身

    异能重生:宅女变身

    写了个愿望,莫名其妙的纸条出现在密封的盒子里,程唯唯顿觉阴风阵阵,浑身泛起鸡皮疙瘩,还没来得及调整情绪一道亮光闪过,两眼一黑不省人事,再次睁眼,整个人居然缩水了?是谁在和她开玩笑??……突然冒出来一小家伙,阁下是从小人国来的吧……珍珠当石头?阁下其实是来自东海龙宫的吧……
  • 网游之猎兽世界

    网游之猎兽世界

    你说你有重狙,可以一枪打爆我的头“不好意思我有战甲可以抗重炮”你说你有悬浮装甲车,可以带人撩妹“不好意思,我想我的小型悬浮堡垒应该也可以吧!”就这样阎酒的家族只有他一个男孩和两个姐姐,而且还不像其他家族一夫多妻制,阎酒的家族也算是个隐世家族了,拥有大半个蓝星的资产和军队…………
  • 红尘炼狱

    红尘炼狱

    弹指灭天地,吹发断苍穹!远古四族恩怨纠葛,灵狱大陆暗潮汹涌!这是一个野心勃勃之人的争霸道途,转阴阳,逆生死,吞日月,含星辰,世间众生命运掌控于手。与红颜恩爱缠绵,生别死阔。与仇敌战决九天,青天染血。问,苍生鬼神,谁敢一战?